Section 230 Appellate Opinion

Doe v. Grindr Inc.

🏛 U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 📅 2025-02-18 · 📑 128 F.4th 1148

Issue

Insufficient text to determine — this document contains no legal question related to Section 230, First Amendment doctrine, platform liability, or AI/ML regulation.

What Happened

This document is a Southern District of New York dismissal order in *Paguada v. American Retail Supply Corp.*, No. 21-CV-733, an entirely unrelated action. The court dismissed the case without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) after plaintiff repeatedly failed to meet court-imposed deadlines for filing a motion for default judgment, having missed extensions set for both May 21 and July 30, 2021. The document bears no relation to *Doe v. Grindr Inc.* or to any of the three subject-matter areas covered by this newsletter.

Why It Matters

Insufficient text to determine — this document is misfiled or misattributed and presents no holding, argument, or procedural development pertinent to Section 230 immunity, First Amendment platform doctrine, or civil liability for AI/ML systems.

Related Filings

Other proceedings in the same litigation tracked by this monitor.